JOSEPH E. SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
JENNY L. SMITH, APPELLEE
JOSEPH E. SMITH, APPELLANT,
JENNY L. SMITH, APPELLEE
690 So. 2d 748
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM..
Joseph E. Smith appeals from the final order determining child support. Finding only one error, we affirm but remand with instructions to determine each party’s responsibility for the minor children’s uncovered medical expenses. See, e.g., Green v. Green, 681 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.
PETERSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morgan, Colling & Gilbert, P.A. v. James E. Pope, M.D., 756 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…t heard argument on both motions, which was unfortunate as an objection under the provisions of rule 1.351 is self-executing. There is no need to specify the objections until the deposition takes place. See Russell v. Stardust [*202] Cruisers, Inc., 690 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). The law firm was forced by these circumstances to justify its objection to the production at the hearing on the motion to produce directed to the plaintiff. The court granted respondent’s motion to compel, and the law firm reque…
Authorities Cited
- Green v. Green, 681 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)