CLARA S. CRAVEN AND WENDELL L. CRAVEN, APPELLANTS,
v.
SKATE N SPACE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Per Curiam Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We issued a per curiam affirmance without opinion in this case. In addition to several other issues presented, appellant sought to appeal an order denying a motion for summary judgment on a question involving an award of attorney’s fees. We declined to review that issue or to certify a conflict as suggested because, in our view, no appeal-able order had been entered on that issue. See Maryland Casualty Co. v. Century Construction Corp., 656 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(non-final orders entered after final order on authorized motions which do not suspend rendition immediately reviewable only if they would not otherwise be reviewable following entry of subsequent final order); see also Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Our affir-mance is without prejudice to raise this issue when an appealable order has been entered. The motion for clarification is GRANTED to the extent indicated; however, we decline to accept the suggestion of conflict.
BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Scott v. Women's Med. Grp., P.A., 837 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…rule 9.130(a)(4), because it contemplates a future final order, either granting or denying the appellants’ motion with finality, at which point the appellants will have the right to appeal [*578] that final order. See Craven v. Skate N Space, Inc., 691 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Century Construction Corp., 656 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). DISMISSED. BARFIELD, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Md. Cas. Co. & N. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Century Constr. Corp., 656 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Kelley v. Kelley, 667 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)