ASSOCIATED DRY GOODS CORPORATION, NOW KNOWN AS THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
JOEL ROBBINS, AS PROPERTY APPRAISER OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND RICHARD GARDNER, AS TAX COLLECTOR OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Associated Dry Goods Corporation appealed a dismissal of its mandamus action seeking to compel the Dade County Property Appraiser to issue a separate assessment for the Lord & Taylor building it operates under a land lease. The court affirmed the dismissal, holding that Florida Administrative Code Rule 12D-13.007 does not require property appraisers to create separate assessments for tenants under land leases.
Rule 12D-13.007 does not require the property appraiser to create a separate 'cutout' assessment for a tenant under a land lease. The rule applies only to fee simple owners splitting or selling property, not to tenants.
[1] A property appraiser is not required to issue separate tax assessments for portions of property at the request of a tenant under a land lease.
[2] Florida Administrative Code Rule 12D-13.007 applies to fee simple owners who sell or subdivide their property, not to tenants under a land lease.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Florida Administrative Code Rule 12D-13.007 [does] not require the property appraiser to 'cut out' the property at the request of a tenant under a land lease.”
Establishes the holding that the rule does not apply to land lease tenants.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAssociated Dry Goods Corporation owns the Lord & Taylor store building at Dadeland Mall but leases the underlying land from the mall owner under a lea…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
COPE, Judge.
Associated Dry Goods Corporation appeals an order dismissing its mandamus action against the appellee Dade County Property Appraiser with prejudice. We affirm.
Appellant Associated Dry Goods Corporation operates the Lord & Taylor store at the Dadeland Mall. Associated owns the store building. Associated leases the land underneath the store from the owner of the Dade-land Mall under a lease running to the year 2002.1 At the conclusion of the lease, the owner of the Dadeland Mall will own the Lord & Taylor building as well as the land.
Associated brought a mandamus action in the circuit court, seeking to compel the Property Appraiser to issue a separate assessment for the Lord & Taylor building. Associated claims that it is entitled to the requested relief by reason of Rule 12D13.007, Florida Administrative Code, which provides in part:
Rule 12D-13.007 Splits and Cutouts, Time for Requesting and Procedure.
(1) When property has been properly assessed in the name of the owner as of January 1 of the tax year, the appraiser may not cancel the assessment by reason of a sale of the whole or a part of the property. The assessment is against the property, not the owner. (2) When the new owner or the original owner wishes to pay taxes on his proportionate share of the whole property, it is the duty of the property appraiser to figure the amount of the assessment on that portion of the whole.
We agree with Judge Rivkind that “Florida Administrative Code Rule 12D-13.007 does not require the property appraiser to ‘cut out’ the property at the request of a tenant under a land lease.” Order of Dismissal, June 20, 1996. The Rule applies where, for example, the owner of a parcel of real estate sells part and keeps part. If the original parcel had a single assessment, then the original owner and new owner are entitled to separate assessments on their respective shares. Op.Att’y Gen.Fla. 75-105, at 181 (construing predecessor Rule). The same logic would apply if the original owner sold the entire parcel in pieces to separate buyers. See id By its terms, the Rule applies to fee simple owners, not tenants under a land lease.
Affirmed.
. The lease contains provisions for six ten-year extensions.