CARMEN KRASNICK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1997-03-26
No. 95-3457
POLEN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
691 So. 2d 524 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Carmen Krasnick alleges error in the trial court’s order revoking her probation. Her points on appeal, while worded slightly differently, are identical to those raised by her husband and codefendant in Krasnick v. State, 691 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). In that case we affirmed the order revoking Lawrence Krasnick’s probation, writing only to note the Krasnicks waived review of alleged deficiencies in the 1989 probation order. As we said in that opinion, had the issue been properly preserved, we would conclude the Krasnicks’ failure to make even a minimal effort toward payment of monthly restitution supports affirmance. We affirm the order revoking Carmen Krasnick’s probation, and adopt the reasoning expressed in our opinion in case no. 95-3623.

POLEN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Krasnick v. State, 691 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
    …yment. Ragatz v. State, 679 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur. . The case of Carmen Krasnick has not been consolidated with that of Lawrence Krasnick. The opinion concerning her appeal is contained in case No. 95-3457, 691 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 4th DCA March 26, 1997).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw