MATTHEW C. LOCKE, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
RHONDA LOCKE-MIXON, F/K/A RHONDA MANSFIELD LOCKE, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1997-04-23
No. 96-3184
Before LEVY, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
691 So. 2d 649 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Topics
Petition For Modification Of Child Support Child Support Guidelines Imputation Of Income

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Modification Of Child Support cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the confession of error by both parties in this cause, as reflected by the “Stipulation” entered into by counsel for both parties, the Amended Final Judgment entered by the trial court on October 24, 1996, is reversed. The reasons for the confessions of error entered by both parties are that (1) the trial court reversibly erred by refusing to utilize Florida child support guidelines when calculating a modification of child support, and (2) the trial court reversibly erred by failing to make a factual finding on the record or in the final judgment as to the parties’ actual income or imputed income when calculating child support, and (3) the trial court reversibly erred by failing to address the issue of, and to factor into the final judgment, the appellant’s two minor children adopted by the appellant subsequent to the birth of the three minor children born during the marriage of the appellant and the appel-lee.

Accordingly, the said judgment is reversed and this cause is remanded for a new hearing on the Former-Wife’s Petition for Modification of Child Support.

Reversed and remanded.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Tobkin v. State, 777 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …ssolution, or any other civil action. In a civil case where a voluntary dismissal is entered, the trial court no longer has jurisdiction to act in the case. See Randle-Eastern Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. Vasta, 360 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1978); Stone v. Stone, 691 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Gonzalez v. Turner, 427 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). As previously discussed, this case does not involve the situation where the court is obligated to assume jurisdiction because of its inherent responsibility for the custody…
  • Newberry v. Newberry, 831 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …o provision to calculate child support for some, but not all, of the parties’ common children. The child support guidelines must be utilized when calculating child support in a modification proceeding or it is reversible error. Locke v. Locke-Mixon, 691 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Furthermore, section 61.30 is premised on the concept that the amount of child support is a global issue, calculated on all the common dependent children of the parties, as well as both parents’ incomes. No provision exists whic…
  • Rebolledo v. Mireya Cristina Cambero Cordero, 217 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …s voluntary dismissal on September 4, 2014. See 84 Lumber Co. v. Cooper, 656 So. 2d 1297, 1299-300 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Husband’s voluntary dismissal ended the case, depriving the trial court of any further jurisdiction over the case. Stone v. Stone, 691 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (Mem). Therefore, any and all orders entered after the trial court was divested of jurisdiction were void. [*150] Herbits, 197 So. 3d at 578. While, notwithstanding Husband’s dismissal, the trial court and the parties proceeded as…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw