DAVID B. INGRAHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1997-02-12
No. 96-2555
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., GREEN, J., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.
691 So. 2d 1090 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Parker v. State, 611 So. 2d 1224 (Fla.1992); Medina v. State, 573 So. 2d 293 (Fla.1990).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Affordable Contracting, Inc. v. Santarsiere, 693 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
    …endants were unrepresented, the special master conducted a hearing and issued a report on a pending motion concerning defendants’ alleged discovery violations, and the trial court entered an order approving the report. Pursuant to Dunker v. Calkins, 691 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 3d [*1124] DCA 1996), and cited cases, the special master and the trial court should have deferred action on the pending matter during the twenty-day interval. Accordingly, the order denying defendants’ motion to vacate must be reversed. Rev…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw