STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
EUGENE EVANS, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clerical Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We granted review of Evans v. State, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1444, — So. 2d - [1996 WL 332340] (Fla. 1st DCA June 18, 1996), based on express and direct conflict with San Martin v. State, 591 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). However, after closer examination of the two cases, we have determined that there is no express and direct conflict.1 Jurisdiction was therefore improvidently granted and the petition for review is accordingly dismissed.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. . Both Evans and San Martin deal with departure sentences and clerical errors involving the misplacement of orders setting forth written reasons for departure sentences. Section 921.0016(1), Florida Statutes (1993), requires that a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure be filed within fifteen days after the date of sentencing. In Evans, the order was erroneously placed in a probation file and was not filed with the clerk within fifteen days as required by the statute. In San Martin, the order was properly filed with the clerk, but was misplaced thereafter. Thus, the statute was complied with in San Martin but not in Evans.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (93 total)
-
Pagan v. State, 830 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 2002)…e court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and the reviewing court must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling. See Murray v. State, 692 So. 2d 157 (Fla.1997). The reviewing court is bound by the trial court’s factual findings if they are supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Butler v. State, 706 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The trial court’s determination of the legal issue of p…
-
Seburt Nelson Connor v. State, 803 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2001)…us clothed with a presumption of correctness and, as the reviewing court, we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling.” Murray v. State, 692 So. 2d 157, 159 (Fla.1997); see also Walker v. State, 707 So. 2d 300, 311 (Fla.1997) (“[A] trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress is accorded great deference.”); Escobar v. State, 699 So. 2d 988, 993-94 (Fla.1997). Significantly, however, the question of…1 / 2
-
Dolan Darling v. State, 808 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2002)…ted his knowledge and experience regarding both the methodology and the databases employed. The fact that he was not, himself, a statistician is not a sound basis to exclude his expert testimony regarding the statistical results. Cf Murray v. State, 692 So. 2d 157, 164 (Fla.1997) (observing that “it is not absolutely necessary for an expert witness to demonstrate practical experience in the field in which he will testify”; rather, the expert must “demonstrate a sufficient knowledge of the database grounded in…
Previewing 3 of 93 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Martin v. State, 591 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)