FRANK DURDEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FRANK DURDEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
692 So. 2d 275
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Wright v. State, 681 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
COBB, W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tennant v. State, 827 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…tate, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla.2000); State v. Mike, 760 So. 2d 145 (Fla.2000). Further, because these matters involve issues of fact and procedure, they are not cognizable in the context of a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a). See Robinson v. State, 692 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Church v. State, 652 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). These alleged errors do not produce an illegal sentence or fundamental error. Any issue concerning the voluntariness of Tennant’s pleas in these eleven cases, should have been…
-
Rolls v. State, 911 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Carter v. State, 786 So. 2d 1173 (Fla.2001); Robinson v. State, 692 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). PETERSON, SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Wright v. State, 681 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)