JOSEPH C. HOFFMAN AND KATHERINE HOFFMAN, PETITIONERS,
v.
MICHAEL W. DICKERSON, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
JOSEPH C. HOFFMAN AND KATHERINE HOFFMAN, PETITIONERS,
MICHAEL W. DICKERSON, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
692 So. 2d 316
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari before this court seeks review of an order denying a motion to consolidate two eases below.
The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed because this court does not have jurisdiction. The petition was filed more than thirty days after the entry of the order denying consolidation. A motion for rehearing directed to an interlocutory order is unauthorized and does not toll the time for the filing of a petition for certiorari. Shelnutt v. Citrus County, 660 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Coldwell Banker Commercial v. Wightman, 649 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
PETITION DISMISSED.
GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harris v. State, 698 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…uires him to pay a one-time $50 non-recurring processing fee and an accompanying 4%. surcharge in conjunction with administrative probation. Since none of these special conditions were orally pronounced, they must be stricken. See Gearhart v. State, 692 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Jackson v. State, 685 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).1 See also Justice v. State, 674 So. 2d 123 (Fla.1996). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. DAUKSCH, COBB and ANTOON, JJ., concur. . We do, however, lake thi…
-
E-Z Marine Supply, Inc. v. Wachovia Commercial Mortg., Inc., 875 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…der in this case, which provided for payments during the pendency of the underlying lawsuit, was not “final in nature.” The motion for rehearing did not toll the time for filing of the notice of appeal. Deal, 783 So. 2d at 321; Hoffman v. Dickerson, 692 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). The notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(b). The previously entered dismissal was therefore proper. The motion for rehearing is denied. STEVENSON…
Authorities Cited
- Rose v. State, 649 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Domanico v. State, 660 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Shelnutt v. Citrus Cnty., 660 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)