ROBERT TYNES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Discretionary Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, the defendant, Robert Tynes, raises three challenges to the sentence imposed upon his conviction for robbery with a firearm. The first two issues have merit. Therefore, we strike the $2.00 discretionary cost, pursuant to section 943.25, Florida Statutes (1995). See Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). We also remand for entry of the restitution judgment that was orally pronounced but never entered.
The defendant also contends, for the first time on appeal, that the trial court improperly imposed a three-year minimum mandatory prison term in violation of the plea agreement. This issue is not cognizable on direct appeal because the defendant neither objected below nor moved to withdraw his plea. See Hoskins v. State, 636 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Whiteaker v. Gilreath, 734 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)…he accident he had sold the machine to his brother, Joe. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Don on the basis that there was no issue of material fact as to ownership. That judgment was reversed on appeal in Whiteaker v. Gilreath, 693 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), wherein we stated, “[t]he affidavit on file and the circumstances of the case fail to preclude at least an inference that [Don] Gilreath was the owner of the bucket loader at the time of the accident.” On remand, the case proceed…
Authorities Cited
- Abel Oliveros Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- Hoskins v. State, 636 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)