CHARLES HENRY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1997-03-26
No. 97-00775
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
693 So. 2d 624 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Henry Williams appeals an “order denying” his motion to correct illegal sentence. We dismiss for lack of an appealable order. Although we assume that the trial judge denied Williams’ motion to correct illegal sentence, we are still without an appropriate order rendered in the trial court. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(g) defines rendition of an order as the filing of a judge’s signed written order with the clerk of the trial court. We dismiss this appeal with direction to the trial court to reconsider the motion and render an appropriate order susceptible of this court’s review. If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, it must attach such portion of the record that conclusively refutes Williams’ allegations. See Turner v. State, 667 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Weems v. State, 627 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Appeal dismissed; remanded with directions.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sclease v. State, 745 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
    …PER CURIAM. We dismiss this appeal for lack of an appealable order. See Williams v. State, 693 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)(appeal dismissed where record lacked appropriate order rendered in trial court); Turner v. State, 667 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)(same). Appeal dismissed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw