JOHNNIE GRAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Facially Insufficient Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Johnnie Gray, seeks review of the summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief on grounds two, three and four, as the issues could or should have been raised on direct appeal and are therefore procedurally barred and cannot be raised in a postconviction motion. Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So. 2d 1253 (Fla.1995). We affirm the trial court’s determination that no relief is warranted on ground seven as the claim is facially insufficient. However, we reverse and remand for further proceedings on Gray’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and fundamental error in counts one, five, six, eight and nine. The trial court denied the motion without attaching any documentation which would refute these claims.
On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach portions of the record which conclusively demonstrate Gray is not entitled to relief on these claims. See Becton v. State, 668 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Drymon v. State, 878 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…itial prison term”); Jones v. State, 633 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (stating that, where a defendant is resentenced following violation [*440] of probation, credit for time served does not include forfeited gain time); see also Tillman v. State, 693 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); § 948.06(6), Fla. Stat. (1997). Respondent has not shown that the gain time credit was forfeited for any reason. Therefore, petitioner is entitled to the 412 days of gain time earned between December 11, 1995, and November 20, 19…
-
van Thompson v. State, 771 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…utively to Count One in the other case, no credit was given for time already served in DOC custody. All parties agree that in denying the appellant’s request for credit for time served in the latter case, the trial court erred. See Tillman v. State, 693 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Jones v. State, 633 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The sentence in Circuit Court Case No. 95-3676 is REVERSED, and the case REMANDED, with instructions. ALLEN, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.…
-
Waterman v. State, 46 So. 3d 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…brief, it initially conceded error. However, after we ordered supplemental briefing, the State responded by retracting its concession of error and asserting that Waterman’s pos-trevocation sentence was lawfully imposed pursuant to Tillman v. State, 693 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). II. Analysis We agree with the State that Tillman is dispositive of this case. In Tillman, the appellant was convicted of robbery in four separate cases and sentenced to three years in prison followed by seven years of probatio…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 1995)
- Becton v. State, 668 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)