KENNIS LEE SCHUMMER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Postconviction Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We conclude that all but two of the alleged grounds for relief were facially insufficient or otherwise precluded under rule 3.850, and we affirm the appealed order as to those claims. However, the appellant also alleged that he accepted and deposited certain payments upon counsel’s advice that this would not result in criminal liability, and that counsel failed to present evidence which would have shown that an advance payment was made for work which the appellant would subsequently perform through his own business. These claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were accompanied by the factual recitations necessary to present a prima facie claim for relief with regard to the convictions predicated on these payments. The appealed order is therefore reversed insofar as it summarily denies these claims, and the case is remanded for the trial court to either conduct an evidentiary hearing or provide the necessary attachments refuting the claims as delineated in rule 3.850(d).
MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Renardo Ferguson v. State, 101 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…ation ineffective in the constitutional sense. See Jimenez v. State, 997 So. 2d 1056, 1068 (Fla.2008) (“[Tjrial counsel was not deficient for the failure to discover ... information that was neither exculpatory nor impeaching.”). In Rosado v. State, 693 So. 2d 633, 634 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), the defendant was charged with first degree murder. After conviction and sentence, the defendant filed a Rule 3.850 motion, which claimed, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective for not investigating a gun c…
-
Bellamy v. State, 834 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…an be raised any time, pursuant to error coram nobis. It appears that Bellamy currently resides in a New Jersey prison. However, these issues were not raised in the trial court below and therefore we will not consider them here. See Rosado v. State, 693 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). ■AFFIRMED. THOMPSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.…