SYLVESTER REDDICK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1997-05-09
No. 95-03798
Fulmer, J., Campbell, A.C.J., Schoonover, J.
693 So. 2d 692 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Defendant's conviction for resisting an officer with violence was affirmed, but his sentence was reversed and remanded because the trial court imposed a state prison sentence when the sentencing guidelines scoresheet showed only 28.6 points, below the 40-point threshold required for state prison.


Holding

A trial court lacks authority to impose a state prison sentence when the sentencing guidelines scoresheet total is below 40 points.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court may impose a state prison sanction under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.990 only if the total sentence points on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Sylvester Reddick was convicted of resisting an officer with violence under section 843.01, Florida Statutes, for an offense committed on March 2, 199…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
FULMER, Judge.

FULMER, Judge.

The defendant, Sylvester Reddick, appeals his conviction for resisting an officer with violence, a violation of section 843.01, Florida Statutes (1995). We affirm the defendant’s conviction without discussion. However, we reverse his sentence and remand for resentencing.

The defendant asserts, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred by imposing a state prison sentence. Because the defendant’s offense was committed on March 2, 1995, his sentence is governed by the sentencing guidelines scoresheet found at Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.990. See Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re Sentencing Guidelines, 628 So. 2d 1084, 1084 (Fla.1993) (stating that rule 3.990 applies to offenses committed on or after January 1, 1994). The sentencing computation section of the scoresheet provides that the trial court may impose a state prison sanction only if the total sentence points exceed 40. The sentencing guidelines scoresheet prepared in this case shows a total score of 28.6 points. The scoresheet does not reflect application of either the 1.5 or 2.0 law enforcement protection multiplier or a sentence computation increase using the 1.15 multiplier. Therefore, the trial court was without authority to impose a state prison sentence. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw