STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• L.B. v. State, 700 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1997)
  …. at 1181. ANALYSIS It is an established principle of our constitutional jurisprudence that a statute is considered vague if it “does not give people of ordinary intelligence fair notice of what constitutes forbidden conduct.” See State v. Muller, 693 So. 2d 976, 977 (Fla.1997). While we agree that section 790.001(13) is not “a paradigm of legislative drafting,” State v. Manfredonia, 649 So. 2d 1388, 1390 (Fla.1995), we believe that the term “common [*372] pocketknife,” as contained in the statute, does pro…
• Sieniarecki v. State, 756 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2000)
  …lied to the conduct of others”); Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 756, 94 S.Ct. 2547, 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1974) (recognizing that “[o]ne to whose conduct a statute clearly applies may not successfully challenge it for vagueness”); see also State v. Muller, 693 So. 2d 976 (Fla.1997) (holding that section 316.193(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1993), which requires impoundment or immobilization of a vehicle driven by a person convicted of DUI, unless the court finds that the family of the owner has no [*76] other means of t…
• Epstein v. Bank OF Am., 162 So. 3d 159 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
  …judgment. “[C]onstitutional rights are personal and may not be asserted vicariously.” Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 610, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973). This also holds true specifically for due process challenges. See State v. Muller, 693 So. 2d 976, 978 (Fla.1997) (holding that a defendant lacked standing to challenge a violation of the due process rights of the non-defendant owners of a vehicle). Therefore, the due process argument that the judgment is void is not applicable in this case.2 A…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Milo Wilson, 686 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1996)
• Rodriguez v. State, 683 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)