LEE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

A & G INVESTMENTS, A FLORIDA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pierpont v. LEE Cnty., 710 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 1998)
  …GRIMES, Senior Justice. We review Lee County v. Pierpont, 693 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), Lee County v. A & G Investments, 693 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), and Lee County v. Barnett [*959] Banks, Inc., 22 Fla. L. Weekly D691, — So. 2d -(Fla. 2d DCA March 12,1997). A & G Investments and Barnett Banks, Inc. were resolved on the basis of the decision in Pierpont, and on rehearing in Ba…
• Shaw v. Shaw, 696 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …lchinsky, 662 So. 2d 732, 733 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Loudermilk; see also Wilson v. Roseberry, 669 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Without prior notice and an opportunity to be heard, a litigant’s due process rights are violated. See Roque v. Paskow, 693 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Gielchinsky; Wilson. In this case, the facts do not indicate that a true emergency or extraordinary circumstances existed to justify a lack of prior notice to the husband. The facts certainly do not indicate a true emergency to…
• Wood v. O'Reilley, 763 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
  …on of child support payments from $240.00 per month to $710.00 per month. Although this issue has been raised by the former wife’s petition for modification, it was not noticed for the hearing that resulted in the appealed order. In Roque v. Paskow, 693 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), we reiterated the long-standing rule that trial courts, absent waiver or stipulation by the parties, may not rule on issues which have not been noticed for hearing, and upon which a party is not given an opportunity to be heard.…

Authorities Cited

• Miller v. State, 693 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)