SYSTEM ONE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., APPELLANT,
v.
INCENTIVE CONNECTION TRAVEL, INC., APPELLEE
SYSTEM ONE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., APPELLANT,
INCENTIVE CONNECTION TRAVEL, INC., APPELLEE
693 So. 2d 1092
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find no abuse of discretion in the entry of a temporary injunction and the order denying a motion to dissolve same. See Daoud v. City of Miami Beach, 145 Fla. 449,199 So. 582 (1941); Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). This affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the appellant (defendant in the trial court) seeking an increase in the amount of the injunction bond.1 See Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Dev. Corp., 544 So. 2d 1018 (Fla.1989).
Affirmed without prejudice.
. The original amount of the bond was fixed ex parte and no adequate opportunity to contest the reasonableness of the amount of the bond has been accorded the defendant in the trial court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Murray Bieda v. Mimi Bieda, 42 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…been improvidently entered.” Braswell, 881 So. 2d at 1202. Therefore, on remand, the trial court must revisit this issue after providing the parties an opportunity to present evidence. See Sys. One Information Mgmt., L.L.C. v. Incentive Connection, 693 So. 2d 1092, 1093 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Finally, the former husband correctly contends that the trial court erred in entering a final judgment without providing him notice and a time for response. Although section 61.14(6)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (2009), pr…
Authorities Cited
- Parker Tampa TWO, Inc. v. Somerset Dev. Corp., 544 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 1989)
- O'Brian v. State, 649 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Daoud v. City of Miami Beach, 145 Fla. 449 (Fla. 1941)