LAVERTIS BERNARD WATERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Court affirmed conviction for sale of cocaine but reversed conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia due to insufficient evidence of intent to use the device to ingest a controlled substance.
Possession of drug paraphernalia conviction must be reversed where no drug residue or drugs were found and no evidence showed intent to use the device to ingest a controlled substance.
[1] Possession of drug paraphernalia requires evidence of intent to use the device to ingest a controlled substance; possession of a device without drug residue or drugs pres…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWaters was arrested approximately one month after a cocaine sale offense and had a small metal device in his mouth at arrest that experts identified a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sale Of Cocaine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Lavertis Bernard Waters (Waters) was convicted and sentenced for sale of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. He raises three issues in this direct appeal, only one of which merits discussion. We affirm the judgment and sentence for sale of cocaine and reverse the conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia.
Waters was arrested for the sale of cocaine approximately one month after the offense occurred. He had in his mouth, at the time of his arrest, a small piece of metal which was identified by an expert witness as a device commonly used to smoke controlled substances. However, no evidence was introduced to show the presence of drug residue on the device, nor were any drugs found on Waters at the time of his arrest. Waters argues that there was insufficient evidence of intent to use the device to ingest a controlled substance. We agree that our decision in Nixon v. State, 680 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), requires that we reverse on this count.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence for sale of cocaine is affirmed; we remand the misdemeanor offense of possession of drug paraphernalia to the trial court with instructions to vacate the judgment and sentence on this count.
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.
MINER, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.