SHAWN L. SANDERS, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, GWENDOLYN L. ABRAHAM, AVIS RENT-A-CAR SYSTEMS, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Mid-Century Insurance Company sought a declaratory judgment that its automobile liability policy issued to Gwendolyn Abraham provided no coverage for an accident caused by Abraham's nephew while borrowing her rental car. The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that Abraham's vicarious liability under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine triggered coverage under the policy's plain language.
The policy provided coverage for Abraham's vicarious liability. Under strict construction of the policy against the insurer, Abraham's status as legally liable under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine for allowing Sanders to use the car triggered coverage under the policy's plain language.
[1] An automobile liability policy may provide coverage for an insured's vicarious liability arising from allowing another person to use a vehicle, even if the insured did no…
[2] When construing an insurance policy, ambiguities or uncertainties are strictly construed against the insurer.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We will pay damages for which any insured person is legally liable because of bodily injury to any person and property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a private passenger car, a utility car, or a utility trailer.”
The relevant policy language that the court interpreted to provide coverage for Abraham's vicarious liability
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn April 1, 1995, Gwendolyn Abraham rented a car from Avis and allowed her nephew Shawn Sanders to borrow it. While Sanders had possession of the vehi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Automobile Liability Insurance cases and more on FLexlaw
WOLF, Judge.
This is an appeal from a final declaratory judgment determining that no coverage existed under an automobile liability policy issued by appellee, Mid-Century Insurance Company, to appellant, Gwendolyn L. Abraham. We find that coverage existed in favor of Abraham pursuant to the policy, and reverse.
This case arises out of an automobile accident which occurred April 1,1995. Appellant rented a car from coappellant, Avis Rent-A-Car Systems. She allowed her nephew, appellant Shawn L. Sanders, to borrow the car. Appellee, Mid-Century Insurance Company, had issued a motor vehicle insurance policy to Abraham which was in effect on April 1, 1995.
While Sanders had possession of the car, he was involved in an automobile accident injuring LeJuan Clay. Clay filed a complaint against Sanders, Abraham, and Avis. Mid-Century filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment precluding coverage for the injuries sustained in the April 1, 1995, accident. After a nonjury trial, the trial court found no coverage under the policy. In pertinent part the policy states,
We will pay damages for which any insured person is legally liable because of bodily injury to any person and property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a private passenger car, a utility car, or a utility trailer. It is undisputed that Abraham was legally liable under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine for her decision to allow Sanders to use the car. In an almost identical situation, the second district relying on case law from this district, found coverage for the insured. See Hertz Corp. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 627 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
In Hertz, Amerisure issued a policy to Brown who rented a car from Hertz. The policy in that case stated in relevant part as follows:
We will pay damages for bodily injury or property damage for which any covered person becomes legally responsible because of an auto accident....
Id. at 23. Brown never drove the automobile, but instead rented it for Davis who did not have a credit card. Davis was involved in a fatal accident while driving the car. The victim’s estate sued Hertz, who in turn sued Brown for indemnification under the rental agreement. The trial court found Brown liable, but found no coverage under Brown’s policy with Amerisure. In Hertz, the second district reversed, finding that under a strict construction of the policy against the insurer, the policy afforded coverage based on Brown’s vicarious liability. In the instant case, construing the policy against the insurance company, Abraham’s vicarious liability triggers coverage under the policy. See also American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Blanton, 182 So. 2d 36, 38-39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). We, therefore, reverse and remand for entry of a judgment in favor of appellant.
BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Lancaster, 731 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 1998)…under the analysis of Lynce, the State cannot apply section 944.278 (the Safe Streets Initiative) to Lancaster to cancel his Administrative Gain Time or Provisional Credits without violating the Ex Post Facto Clause. See also Jackson v. Singletary, 695 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(applying first part of section 944.278 canceling awards for all inmates serving sentences in DOC’s custody to petitioner would be an ex post facto violation based on analysis in Lynce)-, State ex rel. Florida Dept. of Corrections…
-
Donovan v. Moore, 755 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2000)…rdingly, we hold consistent with the United States Supreme Court decision in Lynce that the State may not cancel or forfeit Donovan’s Administrative Gain Time and Provisional Credits under the Safe Streets Initiative. See also Jackson v. Singletary, 695 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(applying first part of section 944.278, canceling awards for all inmates, to petitioner would be an ex post facto violation based on analysis in Lynce); State ex rel. Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Stevenson, 695 So. 2d 727 (Fla.…
Authorities Cited
- Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Blanton, 182 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
- HERTZ Corp. & William H. Brown v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 627 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)