BRUCE WAYNE YOUNG, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probationary Employee Status cases and more on FLexlaw
THOMPSON, Judge.
Bruce Wayne Young appeals his convictions and sentences for two counts of sexual battery on a child by a person in familial or custodial authority1 and for possession of a videotape showing sexual activity with a child.2 We affirm the convictions and the sentences imposed for the sexual battery counts, but we remand for correction of the sentence imposed for possession of the videotape.
During sentencing, the trial court announced concurrent sentences of ten years imprisonment followed by ten years probation for the sexual battery counts, and five years imprisonment for possession of the videotape. The written sentence for possession of the videotape does not, however, comport with the court’s oral pronouncement in that it reflects an additional five year probationary period. Accordingly, we remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Biles v. State, 693 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for clarification.
W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur. . § 794.01 l(a)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993).
. § 827.071(5), Fla. Stat. (1995).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jowett v. State, 739 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)…lid written reason which is in conflict with the court’s stated lawful reason at sentencing, while creating an ambiguity, should not prevent the trial court, on remand, from resolving the ambiguity and entering his intended sentence. Young v. State, 695 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Tory v. State, 686 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).…
Authorities Cited
- Biles v. State, 693 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)