ROC GP CORPORATION AND CNA INSURANCE COMPANIES, APPELLANTS,
v.
KENNETH JEWETT, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1997-03-14
No. 96-2903
BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
695 So. 2d 749 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Jackson v. Hochadel Roofing Co., 657 So. 2d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Brack v. Glen Johnson, Inc., 418 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Major Barnes v. State, 739 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
    …tate had presented only hearsay evidence of the violation. Although hearsay is admissible in probation revocation hearings, a trial court cannot find a defendant has violated probation solely on the basis of hearsay evidence. See Johnson v. State, 695 So. 2d 749, 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Andrews v. State, 693 So. 2d 1138, 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Hogan v. State, 583 So. 2d 426, 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Here, although the court claimed it was relying on the business records exception to the hearsay rule, th…
  • Faulk v. State, 743 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
    …treatment course which had been required. Hearsay is admissible in violation of probation hearings, but may not form the only evidentiary support for the alleged violation. See Andrews v. State, 693 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Johnson v. State, 695 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). In the instant case, the record demonstrates clearly that the termination of treatment report is the only basis upon which the trial court determined that the appellant willfully violated his probation. There is no other evidenc…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw