BYRON LEONARD TILLMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BYRON LEONARD TILLMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
695 So. 2d 767
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Byron Tillman appeals from a conviction for robbery with a weapon (a BB gun). As to the appellant’s issue of whether as a matter of law the evidence was sufficient to convict him for carrying a weapon, we affirm in reliance upon Dale v. State, 669 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. granted, 678 So. 2d 337 (Fla.1996).
AFFIRMED.
ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ST. Mary's Hosp., Inc. v. Phillipe, 769 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 2000)…ad but one child, and the jury returned a verdict of $400, 000, the damages award may not appear as ex [*971] cessive as $2.8 million seems to be at first glance. 653 So. 2d at 1059 (emphasis added); see also and Snoozy v. United States Gypsum Co., 695 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (holding that where a jury awarded the wife economic and noneconomic damages, but failed to award damages for decedent’s minor children in a wrongful death action, the wife was entitled to a new trial to determine the children’s d…
-
Lagueux v. Union Carbide Corp., 861 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…or a jury to receive jury instructions and a verdict form to decide the case pursuant to section 768.81, Florida Statutes (1991) and Fabre. Dougherty, 636 So. 2d at 748 (emphasis added); see also Nash, 678 So. 2d at 1264; Snoozy v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 695 So. 2d 767, 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Based on a thorough reading of the record, we find that Union Carbide failed to provide the necessary and specific evidence described in Dougherty. The scant evidence offered by Union Carbide was not enough to “permit the j…
-
Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Merker, 907 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…s consortium claim. The trial court found that the award was against the manifest weight of the evidence “given the unrebutted and undisputed evidence of love and affection between Mr. Merker and the decedent.” In Snoozy v. United States Gypsum Co., 695 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), this Court reversed an Order denying plaintiffs’, the decedent’s children, Motion for New Trial. In Snoozy, a jury returned a verdict against the defendant, finding that defendant was responsible for decedent’s death. The jury aw…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Dale v. State, 669 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)