GERARD MURGOLO, SR., APPELLANT,

v.

DONNA FRANKART, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Corey v. Corey, 29 So. 3d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …s. This conclusory opinion testimony, not based upon any observable facts, did not constitute competent and substantial evidence on the issue of a stable environment for the parties’ son. See § 61.13(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2007); cf. O’Brien v. Crumley, 695 So. 2d 881, 882 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ordering rotating custody where “[o]nly the mother opined that the arrangement was unsuitable but she was unable to specify any adverse effects resulting from the arrangem…
• Roma Hosein v. Hosein, 785 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …ild. Although the order refers to the parties’ prior rotating custody plan as a reason for ordering rotating custody, the record does not reflect the court’s consideration of how the child adjusted to that arrangement. See, e.g., O’Brien v. Crumley, 695 So. 2d 881, 882 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(affirming rotating custody order where the evidence reflected that the child had adjusted well to the rotating custody in effect prior to the trial court’s order and was thriving in the arrangement). Moreover, we note that t…
• van Duyne v. van Duyne, 856 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
  …l parent and that the trial court’s findings do not support an unequal division of marital assets. We find no fault with the trial court’s determination that rotating custody is in the best interests of the children. See, e.g., O’Brien v. Crumley, 695 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (holding evidence supported determination that rotating custody was in child’s best interest where child had adjusted well to rotating custody schedule in effect prior to determination and the child had close ties and a loving re…