WALTER GEORGE CHAMBERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A sentence exceeding a plea bargain, but not the statutory maximum, is not an illegal sentence under Rule 3.800(a).
Chambers pleaded guilty to second-degree murder based on a plea bargain for a 12-year sentence, but received a 14-year sentence. He filed a motion und…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Maximum Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
W. SHARP, Judge.
Chambers appeals from the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He alleges that he pled guilty to one count of second degree murder in Case No. 94-11724, pursuant to a plea bargain guaranteeing him a 12 year sentence, to run concurrently with another sentence in Case No. 93-3848. Not until he arrived in prison did he learn he received a 14 year sentence, and the written judgment does not state that the sentence runs concurrent with the sentence he received in Case No. 93-3848.
A defendant may challenge an illegal sentence by filing a motion pursuant to Rule 3.800(a). In this context, that includes a sentence which exceeds the maximum time allowed by law. State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983 (Fla.1995). A sentence is not illegal because it exceeds the agreed upon sentence under a plea bargain. Graham v. State, 641 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
In this case, Chambers’ sentence of 14 years did not exceed the statutory maximum sentence, because murder in the second degree is punishable by a term of years not exceeding life. Section 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). In order to challenge the sentence because it does not comply with the plea bargain, he must file a motion pursuant to Rule 3.850. Our affirmance of the summary denial in this case is without prejudice for Chambers to timely file a motion pursuant to Rule 3.850. However, time has apparently almost run out on that remedy, since Chambers was sentenced in this case in July of 1995.
AFFIRMED without prejudice to file a motion pursuant to Rule 3.850.
DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. State, 708 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed without prejudice to file a motion with the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 within sixty days of this order. See Chambers v. State, 695 So. 2d 1264, 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.…
-
Alton G. Robinson v. State, 738 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)…PER CURIAM. See Chambers v. State, 695 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983 (Fla.1995); McCrae v. State, 437 So. 2d 1388 (Fla.1983); Yates v. State, 509 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). AFFIRMED. COBB, W. SHARP, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 1995)
- Wood v. State, 641 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)