BRENT SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1997-07-02
No. 96-00913
LAZZARA, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
695 So. 2d 1317 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Brent Smith appeals the sentence he received after his probation was revoked. He contends the trial court did not award him the appropriate amount of credit for time served on the incarcerative portion of his probationary split sentence pursuant to Tripp v. State, 622 So. 2d 941 (Fla.1993). The written sentence reflects that the only credit for time served awarded Smith was for time spent in jail awaiting imposition of the present sentence. The provision on the written sentence directing that Smith be allowed credit for all time previously served in the Department of Corrections was not marked. At sentencing, however, the trial court directed that Smith be given credit for time served as well as for any gain time to which he might be entitled.

Accordingly, we remand this case for correction of the written sentence to comport with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing.

Affirmed but remanded for correction of sentence.

LAZZARA, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hayden v. State, 753 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
    …. At the sentencing hearing the court had pronounced that the sentences were to be served concurrently. Accordingly, we remand this case for correction of the written sentence to comport with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Smith v. State, 695 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We also agree with Hayden’s contention that the trial court should not have imposed costs for the Juvenile Assessment Center and the Teen Court Program because those costs assessments were not enacted until after the date of hi…
  • Bernardo Alvarez v. State, 746 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
    …ntences, including those from which this appeal was taken. The record, however, contains no sentencing order that reflects this oral pronouncement. Therefore, we remand for clarification and possible correction of the sentencing. See Smith v. State, 695 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concurs.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw