RILLA J. HENRY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. JONES, PETITIONER,
v.
NATIONAL HEALTH CARE AFFILIATES, INC., AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE WOODLANDS NURSING CENTER, A/K/A WOODLANDS REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CARE CENTER, RESPONDENT

Fla. 2d DCA | 1997-05-30
No. 97-00121
Parker, A.C.J., Altenbernd, J., Whatley, J.
696 So. 2d 1223 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida Supreme Court disapproved the Second District's prior holdings prohibiting ex parte contact with former employees, and the court quashed the trial court's order restricting such contact in a nursing home negligence case.


Holding

Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-4.2 does not prohibit an attorney's ex parte communications with former employees of a defendant-employer.


Headnotes

[1] Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-4.2 does not prohibit an attorney's ex parte communications with former employees of a defendant-employer.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Robert R. Jones received care and treatment at Woodlands Nursing Center operated by National Health Care Affiliates, Inc. The estate of the deceased b…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court which prohibited counsel from engaging in ex parte contact with former employees of National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., d/b/a Woodlands Nursing Center, who cared for and treated the decedent whose estate is a party to this case. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion based on this court’s holding in Barfuss v. Diversicare Corp. of America, 656 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), Keesal v. First Healthcare Corp., 684 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), and Wilson v. Central Tampa Nursing Home, Ltd., 691 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We had certified direct conflict with the holdings of Reynoso v. Greynolds Park Manor, Inc., 659 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), and Estate of Schwartz v. H.B.A. Management, Inc., 673 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Recently, the Florida Supreme Court disapproved Barfuss and held that Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-4.2 does not prohibit “an attorney’s ex parte communications with former employees of a defendant-employer.” H.B.A. Management, Inc. v. Schwartz, 693 So. 2d 541, 546 (Fla.1997). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the order prohibiting counsel from engaging in ex parte contact is quashed.

Certiorari granted.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw