ERIC KAPLAN, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ERIC KAPLAN, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
697 So. 2d 144
Florida Supreme Court (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We granted review of Kaplan v. State, 681 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), based upon express and direct conflict with other decisions of this Court and courts in this state. See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. However, after closer examination of the cases, we have determined that there is no express and direct conflict. Jurisdiction was therefore improvidently granted and the petition for review is accordingly dismissed.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Amendment TO Fla. Rule OF Jud. Admin. 2.055(c), 711 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 1998)…As a result of these comments, we suspended until January 1, 1999, the application of rule 2.055(c) to the extent it applies to papers other than those specifically described in section 695.26. See Amendment to Fla. Rule of Judicial Admin. 2.055(c), 697 So. 2d 144 (Fla.1997). We also directed that any further suggested modifications of that rule be submitted by January 1,1998. Only a few comments were received. After having reviewed these comments, we find we should modify the rule and adopt the proposal joi…
Authorities Cited
- Kaplan v. State, 681 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)