G.K.A., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
G.K.A., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
697 So. 2d 228
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. State v. J.L., 689 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nevil McDonald Lopez v. State, 716 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…2d 1253, 1256 (Fla.1987). That is so because the threat “indicates a desire to evade prosecution and is evidence of consciousness of guilt.” Coronado v. State, 654 So. 2d 1267, 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (citations omitted); see also Jenkins v. State, 697 So. 2d 228, 229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Likewise admissible on the issue-of defendant’s guilt is a third person’s attempt to influence a witness “provided the attempt was with the authority, consent, or knowledge of the defendant.” Manuel v. State, 524 So. 2d 73…
-
Coleman Fred Sule v. State, 968 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…vade a threatened prosecution by any ex post facto indication of a desire to evade prosecution is admissible against the accused where the relevance of such evidence is based on consciousness of guilt inferred from such actions.”); Jenkins v. State, 697 So. 2d 228, 229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“a defendant’s direct threat against [*105] a witness is relevant and may be admitted into evidence because it could be indicative of the defendant’s guilt of the underlying offense”). The trial court did not err in denying…
-
Luongo v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- State v. J.L., 689 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)