REXFORD TWEED, APPELLANT,
v.
D. RODNEY SISTRUNK, SUPERINTENDENT, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1997-06-27
No. 96-577
PETERSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
697 So. 2d 888 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sought a writ of mandamus from the circuit court for the return of property he claims was improperly withheld from him after he transferred between prison institutions. The circuit court denied the petition without issuing an alternative writ. We find appellant’s attempts to rely on his constitutional rights to due process and access to the courts to be misplaced. We disagree with the appellee, however, that Title 33 of the Florida Administrative Code does not afford appellant a right to his property insofar as it is authorized and he has storage space available. Accordingly, the appealed order is reversed in part, and we remand for further proceedings. The lower court is directed to issue an alternative writ with respect to the second issue of appellant’s petition consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Waters v. Inch, 266 So. 3d 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
    …the mandamus petition that sought the return of legal documents that were lost or misplaced by the correctional institution and remanding with instruction to have the missing documents returned without cost to the appellant); Tweed v. Sistrunk, 697 So. 2d 888, 889 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (reversing in part the denial of the mandamus petition 4 seeking the return of improperly withheld property upon disagreeing with the appellee that “Title 33 of the Florida Administrative Code does not afford appella…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw