PATRICIA MANNA, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL MANNA, APPELLEE
PATRICIA MANNA, APPELLANT,
MICHAEL MANNA, APPELLEE
697 So. 2d 1280
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in distributing the parties’ marital assets and liabilities where the distribution is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dorsey Goosby v. Lawrence, 711 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…ncial position of the parties,” in a marriage dissolution action. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We conclude that the foregoing findings justify the unequal distribution of the marital assets and liabilities. See Manna v. Manna, 697 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (no abuse of discretion by trial court for distribution of parties’ marital assets and liabilities where unequal distribution was supported by competent substantial evidence). IV. Delay The former husband’s final contention is t…
-
Gonzalo H. Garcia-Ribeyro v. Garcia-Ribeyro, 734 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…rriage. Based upon the record before us, we conclude that there is competent substantial evidence to support all of the lower court’s findings and that the court did not otherwise abuse its discretion in the making of this award. See Manna v. Manna, 697 So. 2d 1280, 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Glazner v. Glazner, 693 So. 2d 650, 651 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); McLean v. McLean, 652 So. 2d 1178, 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Scott v. Scott, 643 So. 2d 1124, 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We therefore affirm the judgment in all res…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)