METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, APPELLANT,
v.
JESUMENE FREDERIC, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Metropolitan Dade County appealed a wrongful death judgment for injuries caused by a Metro-Dade Police cruiser. The court affirmed liability but reversed the damages award, holding that the County could not be held jointly and severally liable under Florida law because its comparative fault (17.5%) was less than the plaintiff's (55%) and the total damages exceeded $25,000.
The County cannot be held jointly and severally liable for either economic or noneconomic damages. Joint and several liability for economic damages is imposed only when each defendant's comparative fault exceeds the plaintiff's fault, which did not occur here. Joint and several liability for noneconomic damages applies only when total damages do not exceed $25,000, which is not the case here. The County is therefore not entitled to a setoff based on the Metrolimo settlement.
[1] A defendant may not be held jointly and severally liable for economic damages unless each defendant's comparative fault exceeds the fault attributable to the plaintiff.
[2] Joint and several liability for non-economic damages is only imposed when the total amount of damages does not exceed $25,000.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“joint and several liability for economic damages will be imposed only if each defendant's comparative fault exceeds the fault attributable to the plaintiff”
Establishes the primary statutory condition for joint and several liability for economic damages under Florida law
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTheresias Frederic was fatally injured when a Metrolimo vehicle he was riding in was rear-ended by a Metro-Dade Police cruiser. Frederic was not weari…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fla. Stat. § 768.81 cases and more on FLexlaw
SHEVIN, Judge.
Metropolitan Dade County appeals a final judgment and orders taxing costs and denying post-trial motions. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.
Theresias Frederic was fatally injured when the Metrolimo, Inc., vehicle he was riding in was rear-ended by a Metro-Dade Police cruiser. Frederic was not wearing a seatbelt. Frederic’s estate and survivors, his widow and six children, filed a wrongful death action against the County and Metroli-mo. Metrolimo settled with the plaintiffs for $25,000. The jury awarded plaintiffs damages, found the County 17.5% at fault, and Frederic 55% at fault for failure to use the seatbelt.
The court entered judgment against the County for $174,536, holding the County jointly and severally liable for the damages. The County appealed. The County later appealed a costs judgment. The appeals were consolidated.
The County raises several arguments in support of reversal. We find merit in the arguments challenging the propriety of the damages calculations. As a threshold consideration, the County is not entitled to an automatic reduction of the awards to $100,000. See § 768.28, Fla.Stat. (1989) (judgment may be claimed and rendered in excess of statutory limits); Berek v. Metropolitan Dade County, 422 So. 2d 838 (Fla.1982); South Broward Topeekeegeeyugnee Park Dist. v. Martin, 564 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), review denied, 576 So. 2d 291 (Fla.1991). However, in this case, the County correctly asserts that it may not be held jointly and severally liable for economic or noneconomic damages.
Florida law only permits joint and several liability under the limited circumstances set forth by statute. § 768.81(3), (4), (5), Fla. Stat. (1995). See Conley v. Boyle Drug Co., 570 So. 2d 275 (Fla.1990). Contrary to the trial court’s conclusion, this case does not fall within those enumerated exceptions. Under section 768.81(3), Florida Statutes (1995), “joint and several liability for economic damages will be imposed only if each defendant’s comparative fault exceeds the fault attributable to the plaintiff.” Cody v. Kemaghan, 682 So. 2d 1147, 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Accord Conley; Williams v. Arai Hirotake, Ltd., 931 F. 2d 755 (11th Cir.1991). Here, the County’s percentage of fault was less than the plaintiff’s. The County cannot be held jointly and severally liable for the economic damages.
Additionally, the County cannot be held jointly and severally liable for the non-economic damages because this is not an action where “the total amount of damages does not exceed $25,000.” § 768.81(5), Fla. Stat. (1995) (emphasis added). See Conley; Smith v. Department of Ins., 507 So. 2d 1080 (Fla.1987); Dewitt Excavating, Inc. v. Walters, 642 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). In this case, the damages awarded exceed $25,-000.
The last matter to be addressed is the $25,000 Metrolimo settlement. Following the guidelines announced in Wells v. Tallahassee Mem’l Reg’l Med. Ctr., 659 So. 2d 249 (Fla.1995), we hold that the County is not entitled to a setoff based on the settlement. Wells specifies that “setoff provisions do not apply to noneconomic damages for which defendants are only severally liable[,]” Wells, 659 So. 2d at 253, and setoffs are only applicable to economic damages where the parties are “subject to joint and several liability.” Id. The County is not jointly and severally liable for economic or noneconomic damages, hence it is not entitled to a setoff for the settlement.
Based on the foregoing, the awards against the County should be computed as follows: The damages awarded to the estate ($60,302) should be reduced to the 17.5% negligence the jury attributed to the County. This leads to a total of $10,552.85. The damages awarded to the widow are $133,280. After reduction to 17.5%, the County is responsible for $23,324. As for the five children who were each awarded damages of $50,000, the County is responsible for 17.5% thereof for a total of $8,750 for each child. The sixth child was awarded $20,000 in. damages, of which the County is responsible for $3,500, representing 17.5% of the jury’s award.
We affirm the judgment of liability against the County, and affirm the costs judgment, see Berek, 422 So. 2d at 840, we reverse the damage awards and remand for entry of damage awards consistent with this opinion.
Remaining points lack merit.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gouty v. Schnepel, 795 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2001)…if the defendant is required to pay damages on the basis of joint and several liability, that defendant’s rights of contribution and set-off remain unchanged. The Third District applied our decision in Wells in Metropolitan Dade County v. Frederic, 698 So. 2d 291, 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). In Frederic, the estate and family members of a vehicle passenger who was killed in a collision with a police vehicle brought a wrongful death action against both the county and the company that owned the vehicle. Id. The pl…
-
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Levalley, 786 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…s well, in the event of any judgment against Carnival, the Soper settlement should be set off proportionally under Wells v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc., 659 So. 2d 249 (Fla.1995). See also Metropolitan Dade County v. Frederic, 698 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), appeal denied, 705 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1997). It should neither be treated as a complete setoff, as Carnival argues, nor totally disregarded, as the trial court erroneously determined. See Wells, 659 So. 2d at 249; McDermott Inc. v. Am…
-
Hibbard v. McGRAW, 918 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…5,000. Since McGraw’s percentage of fault (5%) was less than Carr’s percentage of fault [*973] (25%) and the total amount of damages exceeded $25,000, the doctrine of joint and several liability does not apply. Metropolitan Dade County v. Frederic, 698 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 705 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1997). Prior to trial, Carr settled with Brock for $100,000 but this does not benefit McGraw. The provisions for setting off settlement proceeds do not apply to non-economic damages for which the defend…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith v. Dep't OF Ins., 507 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 1987)
- Wells v. Tallahassee Mem'l Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 659 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 1995)
- Conley v. Boyle Drug Co., 570 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1990)
- Berek v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 422 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 1982)
- Cody v. Kernaghan, 682 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Williams v. Arai Hirotake, Ltd., 931 F.2d 755 (11th Cir. 1991)
- In the Interest of M.M., 564 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- State v. Derick L. Grace, 564 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Dewitt Excavating, Inc. v. Walters, 642 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)