HARRY K. SINGLETARY, APPELLANT,

v.

MICHAEL A. NEWGENT, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Boyne v. State, 728 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …ppel in this situation. See State v. Leroux, 689 So. 2d 235, 238 (Fla.1996) (defendant who has initially acknowledged under oath that no such promises have been made will generally be estopped at a later time to claim otherwise), and Resta v. State, 698 So. 2d 378, 378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (during plea colloquy, it is incumbent upon the defendant to reveal any additional expectations he may have because generally he will be estopped from later arguing a position contrary to statements made in open court or in w…
• Derick Hoskins v. State, 713 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …is informed by the court during the plea colloquy that he may have to serve every day of a ten-year sentence could hardly reasonably rely on counsel's advice to the contrary.” State v. Leroux, 689 So. 2d 235, 238 (Fla.1996); see also Resta v. State, 698 So. 2d 378, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 703 So. 2d 477 (Fla.1997). Affirmed.…
• Bauder v. State, 802 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
  …[*453] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Resta v. State, 698 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 703 So. 2d 477 (Fla.1997).…

Authorities Cited

• Singletary v. Brown, 693 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)