DANIEL LEE LOSEY, PETITIONER,
v.
MARIE BERNIER LOSEY, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court granted a petition for disqualification of a trial judge. The judge had a close personal and professional relationship with the former wife and her employer, who was also the judge's personal friend and had facilitated an adoption by the judge. These circumstances created a reasonable fear of bias.
Yes, the facts presented were sufficient to create a well-grounded fear on the part of the petitioner that he would not receive a fair hearing before the judge, thus warranting disqualification.
[1] A judge must be disqualified when a party has a well-grounded fear that they will not receive a fair hearing due to the judge's relationship with the opposing party or th…
[2] A judge's close personal friendship with an attorney representing a party, combined with frequent communication through that attorney's office with the party, can create…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We conclude that these facts were sufficient to create a “well-grounded fear on the part of petitioner that he would not receive a fair hearing before the judge.””
This quote establishes the legal standard for disqualification and the court's conclusion that the facts met this standard.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe former husband sought to disqualify the trial judge due to her close personal friendship with his former wife's employer, an attorney. The judge w…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Bias And Prejudice cases and more on FLexlaw
KLEIN, Judge.
Petitioner, a former husband involved in post-judgment dissolution proceedings, seeks disqualification of the trial judge as a result of the judge’s relationship with the former wife and her employer. We grant the petition.
The following facts are taken from the petitioner’s sworn motion for disqualification:
1. Respondent/Ex-wife has been employed by attorney Mary Ann Scherer, as her only legal secretary, for approximately ten years.
2. Several years ago, attorney Mary Ann Scherer formed an adoption agency called “Adoption Placement.”
3. Judge Julie Koenig has been an active participant in “Adoption Placement” and has served on the Board of Directors of Mary Ann Scherer’s adoption agency.
4. Respondent/Ex-wife, in her employment for Mary Ann Scherer, is actively involved in the adoptions done by Mary Ann Scherer, whether through her law firm or “Adoption Placement.”
5. Judge Julie Koenig and attorney Mary Ann Scherer are also very close personal friends. As a result, Judge Koenig has frequently called Mary Ann Scherer’s office and talked with Respondent/Ex-wife.
6. Over the past few years Respondent/Ex-wife and Judge Julie Koenig have developed a long standing, friendly relationship.
7. Within the past week, it has come to Petitioner/Ex-husband’s attention that Mary Ann Scherer has recently arranged for a baby to be placed for adoption with Judge Julie Koenig as the adoptive mother. 8. As a result of all of the above fact, the Petitioner/Ex-husband feels that Judge Julie Koenig would be prejudiced and biased against Petitioner/Ex-husband in favor of Respondent/Ex-wife in any hearings or other matters before the Court concerning this case.
We conclude that these facts were sufficient to create a “well-grounded fear on the part of petitioner that he would not receive a fair hearing before the judge.” Wargo v. Wargo, 669 So. 2d 1123, 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) and cases cited therein. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160. We therefore grant the writ of prohibition.
WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Wargo v. Bettina Li Belles Wargo and Julie Koenig, 669 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)