JOHN SMITH, A WIDOWER, APPELLANT,
v.
ALICE PRESHA, A WIDOW, APPELLEE
JOHN SMITH, A WIDOWER, APPELLANT,
ALICE PRESHA, A WIDOW, APPELLEE
107 Fla. 588
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 145 So. 839 · 145 So. 758
Cited by 28 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees; it is therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Aldrich v. Aldrich, 163 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1964)…”. This was interpreted to mean “all cases in equity involving matters which were of exclusive equity jurisdiction under the common law * * * ” In re Niernsee’s Estate, 1941, 147 Fla. 388, 2 So. 2d 737, and it was said in Gill v. Gill, 107 Fla. 588, 145 So. 758, that the matter of granting alimony is “inherently of equitable cognizance, and may be awarded at the discretion of the chancellor according to the facts of the particular case.” It is also well settled that the wife’s equitable rights to or specia…
-
Lisolette Burger v. Burger, 166 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 1964)…“Ground Nine” basis for the “divorce.” Therry v. Therry, supra. In Florida, alimony is a matter of equitable cognizance which rests in the sound discretion of the chancellor in the light of the facts of a particular case. Gill v. Gill, 107 Fla. 588, 145 So. 758; Prine v. Prine, 36 Fla. 676, 18 So. 781, 34 L.R.A. 87. In view of this rule, when the putative wife is the wrongdoer, or as here, when she is equally responsible with the putative husband in creating the situation, she is not entitled to permanent…
-
Ringling v. Ringling, 119 Fla. 210 (Fla. 1935)…858, 107 Sou. 188, and Kellogg v. Kellogg, 93 Fla. 261, 111 Sou. 637, the allegations of the bill of complaint are sufficient to charge extreme cruelty and habitual indulgence in violent and ungovernablé temper. See also Gill v. Gill, 107 Fla. 558, 145 Sou. 758. ■ The question as to whether or not the alleged and admitted condonation occurring subsequent to the filing of a bill of divorce by the complainant which had been dismissed at the behest of complainant upon reconciliation being [*213] reached on S…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence