STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
CECIL SKYLES, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1997-06-26
No. 87640
OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., concur., KOGAN, C.J., dissents., ANSTEAD, J., recused.
698 So. 2d 816 Florida Supreme Court (1997)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review a decision on the following question certified to be of great public importance:

DO THE PRINCIPLES ANNOUNCED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN DAVIS [v. UNITED STATES, 512 U.S. 452, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994)], APPLY TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CONFESSIONS IN FLORIDA, IN LIGHT OF TRAYLOR [v. STATE, 596 So. 2d 957 (Fla.1992)]?

Skyles v. State, 670 So. 2d 1084, 1086 (Fla. DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. 4th V,

In State v. Owen, 696 So. 2d 715 (Fla.1997), we answered the identical question in the affirmative. Accordingly, we do so here and quash the decision below.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., concur. KOGAN, C.J., dissents.

ANSTEAD, J., recused.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw