HENRY HENDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1997-09-17
No. 96-0331
GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
698 So. 2d 942 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects except we remand to the trial court to strike the $2.00 discretionary assessment pursuant to section 943.25(13). See Williams v. State, 697 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Jones v. State, 674 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Barahona v. State, 172 So. 3d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
    …alid concern that any such records made available to Ms. Barahona will in turn be provided by her to the State by virtue of the reciprocal discovery in effect in the case under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(d)(1)(B) (see State v. Boggess, 698 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)); he may be prejudiced because of the trial court’s review of such records and subsequent role in the sentencing phase of the case; and disclosure is prohibited by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”)3…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw