RICARDO MACHADO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1997-09-17
No. 97-159
Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
698 So. 2d 1376 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Young v. State, 697 So. 2d 75 (Fla.1997).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Antuan Lawrence Sconiers v. State, 734 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
    …the written order of revocation, the trial court found Sconiers in violation of the terms of his community control by way of all three charges. A written revocation order must conform to the trial judge’s oral pronouncements. See Jimenez v. State, 698 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Therefore, we remand with directions to the trial court to enter a proper written order that conforms to its oral pronouncements. We [*428] affirm the revocation, however, because in its'written order, the trial court listed othe…
  • Robinson v. State, 763 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …pay costs of supervision and failure to pay court costs, both of which were not found to have been violations in the court’s oral pronouncement. A written revocation order must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Jimenez v. State, 698 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); see also Sconiers v. State, 734 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). We, therefore, remand to the trial court with directions to enter a proper written order which conforms with the court’s oral pronouncement. Because the trial court’…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw