FRANKIE LEE JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1997-08-08
No. 96-3420
PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.
699 So. 2d 257 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that counsel was not ineffective for failing to call alibi witnesses whose testimony would not have exculpated the defendant.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant, convicted of capital sexual battery, claimed his counsel was ineffective for not calling alibi witnesses. These witnesses would alleged…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Judge.

HARRIS, Judge.

Frankie Lee Johnson was convicted of three counts of capital sexual battery on his six year old stepdaughter. His convictions were affirmed by this court in Johnson v. State, 642 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). In his current appeal of the trial court’s summary denial of that portion of his 3.850 motion directed to the ineffective assistance of counsel, Johnson contends that his counsel was ineffective in not calling two “alibi” witnesses, Davis and Smith, who would testify that Smith had sex with the mother of the victim and infected her with gonorrhea. Since the child victim was found to suffer this same malady, Johnson urges that this testimony would somehow support his innocence.

In his motion, Johnson does not explain how Davis became aware of this information or how his testimony would do anything but corroborate Smith’s purported testimony. And even assuming that Smith would have testified that he infected the mother with gonorrhea, there is no indication in the motion that Smith would admit to the sexual battery of the victim. At trial, the mother did not deny that she had sex with Smith. She did deny that he had infected her with gonorrhea. She testified that Johnson had gonorrhea and was taking the same medication prescribed for her. She also testified that although she had sex with Smith on two occasions, he never had access to the victim. And the victim was clear in her testimony that it was Johnson, and only Johnson, that assaulted her some fifty times.

Even if Smith testified as suggested by Johnson, the only benefit of his testimony would be to refute the mother’s testimony that Smith did not have gonorrhea. If the failure to permit this impeachment of the mother on this collateral matter was error, it was harmless.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Allstar Builders Corp., Inc. v. Zimmerman, 706 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
    …Procedure 9.400(c) of the trial court’s order awarding appellee Tracy Zimmerman, d/b/a Modular Assemblers, appellate attorney’s fees. We grant the motion for review and reverse the trial court’s award. In Allstar Builders Corp., Inc. v. Zimmerman, 699 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), we affirmed an order dissolving a prejudgment writ of replevin. Consequently, we granted Zimmerman’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees. Upon remand, Zimmerman moved the trial court for a fee award. The court granted the motion…
  • Baker v. State, 724 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Johnson v. State, 699 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Siegel v. State, 586 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); W. SHARP, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.…
  • Lennox Retail, Inc. v. McMILLAN, 786 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
    …icient basis for issuance of the writ. Because we conclude that the writ was erroneously granted, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the Appellees’ motion to dissolve. See Allstar Builders Corp., Inc. v. Zimmerman, 699 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“The trial court did not abuse its discretion in dissolving the writ.”). We, therefore, affirm the order under review. The provisions contained in section 78.068, Florida Statutes (1999) were enacted “in 1976 apparently to provi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw