ROBERT V. LIKES, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT V. LIKES, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
699 So. 2d 846
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment in all respects. Because, however, the credit for time served was incorrectly calculated, we remand to the trial court to correct the sentence in this respect.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED FOR RECALCULATION OF TIME SERVED.
FARMER, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. State, 838 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 2003)…en order and concluded as follows: This Court specifically finds that counsel’s testimony was both more credible and more persuasive than Defendant’s allegations and testimony. Blan-co v. State, 702 So. 2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 1997); Laramore v. State, 699 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Additionally, the testimony of [trial counsel] demonstrates that Defendant and he discussed the penalty phase of the trial, Defendant’s potential testimony at that phase, and the aggravating and mitigating circumstances which we…
-
Irwin Robinson v. State, 787 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…usory and insufficient to satisfy Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In fact, his allegations are belied by the record, which shows that the defendant moved for several continuances. See Laramore v. State, 699 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Moreover, defense counsel had not had the benefit at the time of State v. Leslie, 699 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (holding [*902] that the fifteen day window period does not apply where the State refiles the charges after ex…