EARNEST LEE NEIL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EARNEST LEE NEIL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
699 So. 2d 1392
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
We grant the motion for clarification on the issue of Neil’s entitlement to credit for time served, in the event this issue might be relevant in his anticipated 3.850 motion. A defendant is entitled to credit for time served on community control during the pendency of his suspended sentence. Norton v. State, 691 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), Warrington v. State, 660 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
Motion for Clarification GRANTED.
W. SHARP, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Palma v. Jenne, 763 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…rceration order. The order directing petitioner’s incarceration is defective on its face because it fails to contain an affirmative finding by the trial court that petitioner possessed the present ability to pay the purge amount. Mroz v. McCampbell, 699 So. 2d 1392 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1985). We recognize our holding in Atlas v. Atlas, 708 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) but find it distinguishable because there was a…
Authorities Cited
- Warrington v. State, 660 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Norton v. State, 691 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)