CICERO LEWIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1933-01-09
Buford, C.J.,and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
107 Fla. 614 Florida Supreme Court (1933) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 145 So. 837
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. Brown, J.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J.,and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J.

I think this writ of error should be dismissed. The Clerk’s certificate does not cover the en*615tire transcript, and plaintiff in error’s brief utterly fails to comply with Rule 20.

Davis, J.

(Concurring). — The Clerk’s certificate to the transcript is insufficient to cover the bill of exceptions, so the judgment must be affirmed on that portion of the record consisting only of the information, verdict and judgment of life imprisonment, which is before us. The Clerk should verify and certify to all of the transcript that is made up, whether prepared by him or not. However, the bill of exceptions if it were properly before us, would not warrant a reversal.

Concurrence
Davis, J.

Davis, J.

(Concurring). — The Clerk’s certificate to the transcript is insufficient to cover the bill of exceptions, so the judgment must be affirmed on that portion of the record consisting only of the information, verdict and judgment of life imprisonment, which is before us. The Clerk should verify and certify to all of the transcript that is made up, whether prepared by him or not. However, the bill of exceptions if it were properly before us, would not warrant a reversal.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Beachland Dev. Co. v. Axel Peterson, 123 Fla. 145 (Fla. 1936)
    …Terrell, J. This case has appeared here on four previous occasions: Beachland Development Co. v. Peterson, 107 Fla. 658, 145 So. 837; Beachland Development Co. v. Peterson, 111 Fla. 349, 149 So. 423; 150 So. 225; and Beachland Development Co. v. Peterson, 117 Fla. 992, 159 So. 923. The last appeal was from a final decree in a mortgage foreclosure entered July 9, 1934, and was di…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw