JOSEPH PINTO, APPELLANT,
v.
EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1997-10-01
No. 97-0234
WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
700 So. 2d 91 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PARIENTE, Judge.

PARIENTE, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment of reforeclosure in favor of appellee, EMC Mortgage. However, we reverse the amount of the judgment. See Tejedo v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 673 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Appellant, Pinto, is entitled to pay the redemption amount he would have been required to pay if he had been joined in the first foreclosure and had elected to redeem promptly upon the filing of the first foreclosure. See Quinn Plumbing Co. v. New Miami Shores Corp., 100 Fla. 413, 129 So. 690 (1930); Thecsuccess Corp. v. Graham, 577 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Tejedo. On remand, an amended judgment shall not include any interest or expenses incurred subsequent to the filing of the first foreclosure action. See Tejedo, 673 So. 2d at 960.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lucky Nation, LLC v. Al-Maghazchi (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)
    …la. 4th DCA 1991). Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to delete the interest, property taxes, and expenses that were incurred after the date of the filing of the original first mortgage foreclosure complaint. See Pinto v. EMC Mortg. Corp., 700 So. 2d 91, 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.1 LEVINE, C.J., and KUNTZ, J., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC…
  • Shana English v. Bankers Tr. Co. OF Cal., N.A., 895 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
    …as not joined in the first foreclosure, this court determined that the owner was entitled to pay the redemption amount that the owner would have been required to pay if the owner had been joined in the first foreclosure. Pinto v. EMC Mortgage Corp., 700 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Therefore, we reverse as to the amount of deficiency and remand for further proceedings. In all other respects, we affirm. GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ„ concur.…
  • Smith v. State, 711 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
    …llant had failed to pay costs and the trial court’s oral pronouncement following the hearing made no mention of a violation for the failure to pay costs. Thus, the written finding that appellant failed to pay costs is erroneous. See Lovett v. State, 700 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Further, under the circumstances here where the state elected not to proceed on the charges of domestic violence and where the record is silent as to whether appellant has been advised about the terms and conditions of his proba…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw