ANTHONY LOVETT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTHONY LOVETT, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
700 So. 2d 91
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
.Anthony Lovett appeals the revocation of his probation. Because the evidence supports the trial court’s findings as to the violation of condition C, we affirm the revocation. The finding in the written order that Lovett violated condition 3 must be stricken, as the State concedes, because the trial court’s oral findings did not include a violation of that condition.
The order of revocation is affirmed, but the finding that Lovett violated condition 3 is stricken.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shana English v. Bankers Tr. Co. OF Cal., N.A., 895 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…as not joined in the first foreclosure, this court determined that the owner was entitled to pay the redemption amount that the owner would have been required to pay if the owner had been joined in the first foreclosure. Pinto v. EMC Mortgage Corp., 700 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Therefore, we reverse as to the amount of deficiency and remand for further proceedings. In all other respects, we affirm. GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ„ concur.…
-
Smith v. State, 711 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…llant had failed to pay costs and the trial court’s oral pronouncement following the hearing made no mention of a violation for the failure to pay costs. Thus, the written finding that appellant failed to pay costs is erroneous. See Lovett v. State, 700 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Further, under the circumstances here where the state elected not to proceed on the charges of domestic violence and where the record is silent as to whether appellant has been advised about the terms and conditions of his proba…