RUSSELL ZACCARIA, APPELLANT,
v.
ANNA ROMA RUSSELL, AND WILLIAM G. CRAWFORD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GREGORY M. ZACCARIA, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that an order dismissing a claim as a discovery sanction is defective if it fails to make findings that the conduct was a willful and deliberate violation of a discovery order.
Appellant's claim for loan reimbursement against his deceased brother's estate was dismissed with prejudice as a discovery sanction. The order of dism…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Drastic Remedy cases and more on FLexlaw
SHAHOOD, Judge.
Appellant, Russell Zacearía, appeals a final order dismissing with prejudice, as a discovery sanction, his claim for loan reimbursement against the estate of his deceased brother. Appellee concedes, and we agree, that the order is defective because it fails to make findings that appellant’s conduct was a willful and deliberate violation of the discovery order. The Rules of Civil Procedure grant the trial judge a broad range of sanctions to enforce the parties’ compliance with court orders. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.200(e), 1.380(b), 1.420(b). Among the alternatives is the au thority to strike a party’s pleadings or order dismissal of the cause. Id. Absent an abuse of discretion, the trial court’s exercise of that discretion may not be disturbed. Clay v. City of Margate, 546 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 553 So. 2d 1164 (1989).
It is uniformly held that dismissal is a drastic remedy which courts should employ only in extreme situations. City of Margate; Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla.1983). In such situations, courts are required to make an explicit finding of willful noncompliance. Commonwealth Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n. v. Tubero, 569 So. 2d 1271, 1272 (Fla.1990); Lahti v. Porn, 624 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Failure to include a recitation of a finding of willful noncompliance in the order requires reversal. Commonwealth Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n., 569 So. 2d at 1272.
The trial court in this case did not make the requisite finding of willful noncompliance with the discovery order prior to dismissing appellant’s claim with prejudice. Therefore, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court reinstate appellant’s claim for damages.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Nat'l Org. FOR Women, Inc. v. State, 832 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…trial court found that Counts I, II, and IV fail to state a cause of action. ' The standard of review as to Counts III and V, dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with the trial court’s order, is abuse of discretion. Zaccaria v. Russell, 700 So. 2d 187, 187-88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing these counts with prejudice. A trial court’s dismissal of an action for failure to comport with its order is an involuntary dismissal under Florida Rule o…
-
SPS Dev. Co., LLC v. DS Enters. OF the Palm Beaches, Inc., 970 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…express written findings of fact supporting the conclusion that the failure to obey the [*498] court’s order amounts- to a willful or deliberate disregard of the court’s order. See Ham v. Dunmire, 891 So. 2d 492, 495 (Fla.2004); Zaccaria v. Russell, 700 So. 2d 187, 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Here, the trial court failed to make any such findings in its order of dismissal. DS contends that Kozel does not apply because the dereliction in this case is that of the litigant rather than the attorney, as SPS’s attorn…
-
Super Prods., LLC v. Intracoastal Env't, LLC, 210 So. 3d 240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…could continue the proceedings and issue an order requiring technical compliance with section 605.0904(1). Dismissal may then become appropriate if the party fails to comply with the court’s order. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(b); Zaccaria v. Russell, 700 So. 2d 187, 187-88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Here, the trial court gave no reason other than noncompliance for granting the much harsher remedy of dismissal, and from the record before us, we discern none. At the hearing on IntraCoastal’s motion to dismiss, the tr…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mercer v. J.D. Raine, Sr., 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1983)
- Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Moshe Tubero, 569 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 1990)
- Executive Square, Ltd. v. Delray Executive Square, Ltd., 546 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Lahti v. Porn, 624 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)