DARRYL PARKER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1997-07-29
No. 97-1039
MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
700 So. 2d 390 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the order by which the trial court summarily denied his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The motion set forth a claim for relief under Ashley v. State, 614 So. 2d 486 (Fla.1993), and State v. Wilson, 658 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1995), but the trial court denied the motion as successive. No prior motion under rule 3.850 and no order in response to any such motion was attached to the order under review, and the appellant’s motion did not acknowledge that he had filed an earlier motion under rule 3.850. Without such attachments or admissions, the appellant’s claim was not conclusively refuted. The order is therefore reversed and this case is remanded to the trial court. Upon remand, the trial court should hold an evidentiary hearing or attach to its order of denial the portions of the record showing conclusively that the appellant is not entitled to relief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d).

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Parker v. State, 766 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
    …med the trial court’s summary denial but reversed and remanded the case for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record conclusively demonstrating that the appellant is not entitled to relief. See Parker v. State, 700 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The trial court denied relief a second time, but this Court remanded the case again for the trial court to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the appellant’s Ashley claim. See Parker v. State, 736 So. 2d 136 (Fl…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw