STATE STREET BANK, APPELLANT,
v.
HERBERT ABRAMOWITZ, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1997-09-24
No. 97-953
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and SORONDO, JJ.
700 So. 2d 732 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

There is no basis for those portions of the orders under review which require the mortgagee to satisfy the mortgage and judgment for anything less than the amount of the final judgment plus interest accrued to the date of a valid tender, which has never occurred. Accordingly, the cause is remanded with directions to set a sale date forthwith and proceed in accordance with the applicable law and this opinion. We do not treat at length the alleged error in postponing the previously set sale because, however erroneous that part of the order, the issue is moot.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …re insufficient to support the jury instruction. Accordingly, Dr. Beilan and West Coast Medical failed to meet their burden on appeal to show that the requested instruction was supported by the facts in evidence. See Valente v. Resort Enters., Inc., 700 So. 2d 732, [*992] 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Because that is so, the trial court abused its discretion when it gave the comparative negligence instruction. See Barton Protective Servs., Inc. v. Faber, 745 So. 2d 968, 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Since there was no…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw