JESSE TURBEVILLE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
JESSE TURBEVILLE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
107 Fla. 631
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Caution
Also reported at: 146 So. 551
Cited by 73 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for' the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being noV advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, O.J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (32 total)
-
Mrs. Jesse Sewell Jones v. Hammock, 131 Fla. 321 (Fla. 1937)…rst Trust and Savings Bank, 105 Fla. 135, 134 So. 493.) Also to work a forfeiture under the statute the principal must knowingly or willfully charge or accept more, than the amount of interest prohibited. Chandler, et ux., v. Kendrick, 108 Fla. 450, 146 So. 551-2. A perusal of the evidence establishes clearly that there was no intent on the part of the appellants to exact any usury of the defendants and there was likewise no idea or intent on the part of the appellees that usury was being exacted from them…1 / 4
-
Dixon v. Sharp, 276 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1973)…the trial court should have borne in mind that the lenders here were entirely unlike the unsophisticated woods [*823] man who unwittingly lent money to a banker at an excessive rate of interest, as was the case in Chandler v. Kendrick, 108 Fla. 450, 146 So. 551 (Fla.1933), upon which the majority chooses to rely for conflict purposes. We are dealing with two successful business people. The facts reveal that they knowingly put themselves squarely in a position clearly violative of our usury laws. The prom…1 / 4
-
Shaffran v. Holness, 102 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)…avings Bank, 105 Fla. 135, 134 So. 493, 142 So. 887, 145 So. 182). Also to work a forfeiture under the statute the principal must knowingly or wilfully charge or accept more than the amount of interest prohibited. Chandler v. Kendrick, 108 Fla. 450, 146 So. 551, 552.” Argintar v. Lydell, 132 Fla. 45, 180 So. 346. One of the established principles governing the payment of commissions to agents in connection with loans is that “when one negotiates a loan through a third party, with a money lender, and the l…
Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence