JEFFREY DONTE WEBB, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JEFFREY DONTE WEBB, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
701 So. 2d 562
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1997)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the order by which the trial court denied his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Because the trial court failed to attach those portions of the record that conclusively show the appellant is entitled to no relief, we reverse the order and remand this case to the trial court. Upon remand, the trial court should hold an evidentiary hearing or attach to its order of denial the portions of the record showing no entitlement to relief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d).
ALLEN, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weiand v. State, 732 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1999)…ENCE (AS NOW AUTHORIZED BY STATE V. HICKSON, 630. So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1994)[) ] TO SUPPORT A CLAIM OF SELF-DEFENSE AGAINST AN AGGRESSOR WHO WAS A COHABITANT OF THE RESIDENCE WHERE THE INCIDENT OCCURRED? Weiand v. State, No. 95-01121, on rehearing from 701 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We rephrase the question as follows: SHOULD THE LAW IMPOSE A DUTY TO RETREAT FROM THE RESIDENCE BEFORE A DEFENDANT MAY JUSTIFIABLY RESORT TO DEADLY FORCE IN SELF-DEFENSE AGAINST A CO-OCCUPANT, IF THAT FORCE IS NECESSARY TO PREV…
-
Livigni v. State, 725 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…with the rule has prejudiced the ability of the opposing party to properly prepare for trial. See Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771, 775 (Fla.1971). Late discovery or location of a witness does not constitute prejudice per se. See Weiand v. State, 701 So. 2d 562, 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), review granted, No. 91,925, — So. 2d — (Fla. Mar. 24, 1998). “[Ojften a very brief recess, during which the parties work cooperatively to address the situation, provides sufficient preparation” for the newly discovered evide…
-
Gutierrez v. State, 731 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…osing argument, a timely objection must be made in order to allow a curative instruction or admonishment to counsel. See Nixon v. State, 572 So. 2d 1336, 1340-41 (Fla.1990). Absent fundamental error, this issue must be affirmed. See Weiand v. State, 701 So. 2d 562, 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), quashed on other grounds, 24 Fla.L. Weekly S124, 732 So. 2d 1044 (Fla.1999). While an improper comment on a defendant’s right to remain silent may be constitutional error, it is not considered fundamental error. See State v.…