EDWARD ZYBURO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Edward Zyburo, challenges the judgments and sentences imposed upon him by the trial court after he was found guilty by a jury of two counts of aggravated assault. We affirm the convictions but strike a portion of a condition of community control.
That portion of condition (10) of the order of community control which requires appellant to pay for testing for drugs, alcohol, or controlled substances is stricken because it is a special condition and it was not announced by the trial court at the sentencing hearing. See Boyd v. State, 688 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We affirm the judgments and sentences in all other respects.
Affirmed as modified.
BLUE, A.C.J., FULMER, J., and MALONEY, DENNIS P., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Christo W. Koulisis, M.D. v. Rivers, 730 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…nel, the second and fifth districts have “interpose[d] an additional step between the discovery of an ethical dilemma and the requirement that a law firm abandon a case_” Esquire Care, 532 So. 2d at 741; see also City of Apopka v. All Corners, Inc., 701 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). The fifth district requires disqualification “only when there is evidence that the law firm obtained confidential information, thereby gaining an unfair advantage, from its new personnel.” City of Apopka, 701 So. 2d at 644. Esqu…
-
Carnival Corp. v. Beverly, 744 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…dingly, disqualification of a party’s chosen counsel is a harsh and drastic sanction and an extraordinary remedy that should be resorted to sparingly. Lee v. Gadasa Corp., 714 So. 2d 610, 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); City of Apopka v. All Corners, Inc., 701 So. 2d 641, 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Pascucci v. Pascucci, 679 So .2d 1311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). It is because disqualification is such an extraordinary sanction that a trial court must exercise its discretion to disqualify counsel only as a last resort to prev…
-
Anderson Trucking Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 884 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…qualified from further participation in this case. Certiorari is the appropriate remedy to review orders granting a motion to disqualify counsel. See Carnival Corp. v. Romero, 710 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); City of Apopka v. All Corners, Inc., 701 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). The standard of certiorari review we must apply in the instant case is whether the trial court’s order of disqualification constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law. Key Largo Rest., Inc. v. T.H. Old Town As…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Boyd v. State, 688 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)