JAMES SULLIVAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the order revoking probation but remanded for correction of scrivener's errors in the record.
Appellant challenged an order revoking his probation for aggravated battery. The probation order contained scrivener's errors regarding the plea enter…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Adjudication Of Guilt cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was placed on probation for aggravated battery. He now challenges the trial court’s order revoking his probation. We affirm the trial court’s order, but remand for the limited purpose of correcting two scrivener’s errors.
Appellant originally entered a plea of no contest, but he later withdrew his plea and-the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing. The administrative probation order, however, reflects that Appellant entered a plea of no contest to the probation violation charge. Accordingly, we remand to the trial court to correct the record to reflect that Appellant was found guilty of violating his probation after the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing. See Morgan v. State, 696 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Moreover, the final order on Appellant’s conviction for aggravated battery reflects that Appellant was adjudicated guilty, while Appellant’s probation order reflects that adjudication of guilt was withheld. On our record, we cannot discern which record document is accurate. Therefore, on remand, the trial court should also amend the record to correct this apparent inconsistency so that the record accurately reflects whether Appellant’s adjudication of guilt was withheld on his aggravated battery conviction.
As to all other issues raised in this appeal, we affirm.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Morgan v. State, 696 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
- Ropella v. Santa FE Steakhouse OF Fruitville, Inc., 696 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)